Harry Potter and Prisoner of Azkaban: why he is the best [translation]

For obvious reasons, Harry Potter films are usually discussed in the context of their correspondence and authenticity to the book. However, they do not often talk about them as independent works of cinema art. But there is something to talk about there. The video below is devoted to the fact that such a notorious director as Alfonso Koaron brought to Potter’s series, and how, thanks to him, the Universe switched from the light adventure stories to a very expensive drama. Nice viewing: 3

(We ask you to switch to YouTube if possible)

Here is our YouTube channel and VK group, where you can also track our work: 3

The best comments

An amazingly interesting article, and yes, the prisoner of Azkaban, for me, is the best film of all about Potter, Koaron could, and this

In terms of directing and operator work – yes, I https://sistersitescasino.co.uk/casinos/666-casino/ agree with what is said in the video. Gorgeous and very correct moves. But in terms of script, this film suffers the same as everyone else – some, in my opinion, important scenes from books were abolished here, so as not to stretch the timing. In my opinion, the prisoner was never told, for example, how Sirius fled.

I am surprised, of course, by the acting of Oldman.I love him very much as an actor, but only recently found out that he played Sirius Black. #Acterbazoskara

To goosebumps on the skin.Thank you, Gleb and Nikolai, for education in the subtleties of cinematography.
Perhaps you need to review the series with the family.

You can call me a Newfag on the site or a tree, but I will still ask. Why write a similar?

By the way, in the same prisoner he noticed, for example, that some plot branches do not close. The fact of the appearance of a new broom, if I am not mistaken, was not explained in any way, and some secondary, but from the no less important branches are lost. This is that it is always difficult to surpass the original if you do not adapt, but film.

By the way, it was always surprised why no one says anything about the 2nd film. Each separate film has any glory, and the 2nd is as if in a limb. A number of fans of which I met and at all memorial on him as “well, we are not talking about him” and was always amazed why?

Solidarity. Columbus made a boy who survived – famous in the cinema. And the rest only parasitized on his success.

This film as “the one who cannot be called”. Only the film “The one we are not talking about”. He is too controversial. A lot of repulsive in it, starting from installation, ending with our localization.
https: // www.YouTube.COM/Watch?V = BHFVNAVLBXW

It is interesting how people who think and, undoubtedly, understanding the subject, find the submissions that the author could not lay down. For example, with glass and mirror-curious, but, I think, the director said: “It will look cool”, or “This is my directorial chip”, or just tritely somewhere on an intuitive level, does something that you can invest your meaning in.
Like for translation.

And about the dad Animaga, not a word is said for the entire series of films, as far as I remember. And most importantly there is a robot scene with patronus on the shore of the lake. Before fainting, Harry sees a cartridge-olive, in the same scene from another angle, so to speak, just waves of light and no deer-patronus, although the concept of animal patronuses return in the fifth part.